A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 271QPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming with the highest refresh rate and value vibrant colors for HDR video editing, the MSI MAG 271QPX with its QD-OLED panel is a strong choice, especially as it costs slightly less. On the other hand, the LG 27GS95QE is more suitable if you're looking for an OLED option with robust color accuracy for digital photo editing, though you might pay a bit more. Both monitors have their strengths, but the LG falls short for competitive gaming, where the faster response and higher refresh rate of the MSI may be critical. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Media Consumption

7.7
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
9.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for competitive gaming.

Productivity

5.8
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) to be only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$650
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
$620
Product imageProduct image

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $650 and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) costs $620.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$650
$620
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
196 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
636 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %138.4 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.5 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 360 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
9.8/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo