A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're looking for superior contrast and color depth for vivid gaming and media experiences, the LG 27GS95QE with its OLED technology excels, offering great performance for both casual and competitive gaming. However, this model might not be the best for productivity tasks due to its smaller size and lower resolution. On the other hand, the LG 38WN95C's larger IPS screen and higher resolution make it a better choice for multitasking and productivity, plus it still delivers a decent experience for casual gaming and media consumption. Although it's more expensive, its expansive screen and aspect ratio could enhance your work and play activities. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
27GS95QE
38WN95C
6.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
27GS95QE
38WN95C
4.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
27GS95QE
38WN95C
6.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.7
27GS95QE
38WN95C
6.2
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$700
27GS95QE
38WN95C
$950
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $950.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GS95QE
38WN95C
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GS95QE
38WN95C
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GS95QE
38WN95C
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GS95QE
38WN95C
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$950
Screen Size
27"38"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 1600
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
196 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
636 nits692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.5 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
9.8/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo