A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GR95QE
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 341CQP
Company ProductName Specs




Advantages of the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.3
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
3.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
9.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
656 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,000
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
$800
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
9.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
656 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.8
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GR95QE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$800
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
196 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
656 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %139.1 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
3.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
8.5/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

PC Gamer

Jorge Jimenez | March 2023
"The LG 27GR95QE-B is a stellar display that makes 1440p again the PC gaming sweet spot due to its high 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic latency. However, its low overall brightness and lack of onboard settings keep it from being great."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
96,500
Recommendations made
14,475
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo