A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




34M2C8600
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer, the Phillips 34M2C8600 with its wider screen and higher refresh rate provides a more immersive experience and better performance for fast-paced games. For serious photo and video editors, its superior color gamut coverage offers more accuracy for work. In contrast, if you want the sharpest text and image clarity for productivity, and you're interested in high-powered HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EQ850 could be your choice despite the higher price. However, for regular daily use or casual gaming, the Phillips offers a versatile package at an upper midrange price, making it a more cost-effective option with only slightly less clarity. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
34M2C8600
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
34M2C8600
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
34M2C8600
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) costs $800.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
34M2C8600
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
34M2C8600
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
34M2C8600
9.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
34M2C8600
5.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$800
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %148.8 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo