A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're willing to invest more for a monitor with exceptional contrast and color depth that's optimal for HDR gaming and media consumption, consider the LG 27EQ850, but be aware that it has lower peak brightness and may not be as well-suited for digital photo editing. On the other hand, the Phillips 27E1N8900 is more budget-friendly and offers a higher peak brightness which is advantageous for photo editing, while still delivering great HDR performance, but it may not be the best choice for competitive gaming due to its response time. Both monitors have comparable color accuracy, making them good for print photo editing, but the LG's lower brightness could be a drawback for vivid HDR content. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED).
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
27E1N8900
5.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
27E1N8900
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
27E1N8900
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
27E1N8900
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
27E1N8900
6.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
27E1N8900
No
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$800
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo