A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 321UPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen and superior color performance for activities like HDR video editing and photo editing, the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) would be an excellent option, and it also excels in media consumption. It's also a strong candidate for competitive gaming due to a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support. Meanwhile, the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) offers an exceptional contrast ratio and is well-suited for HDR gaming and media consumption but falls short in competitive gaming due to the lower refresh rate. Its smaller screen could be a drawback for some users. If budget is a significant concern, the MSI offers more features and better performance at a lower cost, making it a more valuable option overall. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
6.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
7.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is only fair.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
10.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
$900
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) costs $900.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
9.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
MAG 321UPX
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)MSI MAG 321UPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$900
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %138.2 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo