A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize perfect blacks, vibrant colors, and superior contrast for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is a premium choice, especially if print photo editing is important to you. Be aware though, its lower brightness may not be ideal in very bright rooms, and it's not the best for competitive gaming due to higher response times and lack of variable refresh rate (VRR). Conversely, the LG 38WN95C (IPS) offers a larger screen and ultra-wide aspect for immersive productivity and a fair gaming experience, with a good adjustable stand that caters well to digital photo editing, although it falls short in peak HDR brightness and perfect blacks compared to the OLED model. Consider your primary usage and budget to inform your decision. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
38WN95C
6.1
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
38WN95C
4.5
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
38WN95C
6.2
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
38WN95C
$950
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $950.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
38WN95C
No
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
38WN95C
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
38WN95C
No
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
38WN95C
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
38WN95C
No
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$950
Screen Size
27"38"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 1600
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo