If you prioritize outstanding color accuracy and a high resolution for professional photo and video editing, the LG 27EP950 is excellent, with its good HDR support making it suitable for media consumption too. However, it's not ideal for gaming due to a lower refresh rate and lack of variable refresh rate support. On the other hand, the MSI MEG 342C offers a great balance for gaming with a good refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, plus excellent HDR performance. It's also more affordable, but its lower resolution and wider aspect ratio might be less suitable for traditional productivity tasks. The MSI is a better all-rounder, especially if gaming and media are priorities and you're looking to save money. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
Excellent for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Best in class color volume
Key differences
Productivity
6.6/10
5.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.9/10
9.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$3,000
$850
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
5.1/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.