A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




MEG 342C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize outstanding color accuracy and a high resolution for professional photo and video editing, the LG 27EP950 is excellent, with its good HDR support making it suitable for media consumption too. However, it's not ideal for gaming due to a lower refresh rate and lack of variable refresh rate support. On the other hand, the MSI MEG 342C offers a great balance for gaming with a good refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, plus excellent HDR performance. It's also more affordable, but its lower resolution and wider aspect ratio might be less suitable for traditional productivity tasks. The MSI is a better all-rounder, especially if gaming and media are priorities and you're looking to save money. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
27EP950
MEG 342C
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.9
27EP950
MEG 342C
9.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$3,000
27EP950
MEG 342C
$850
Product image
Product image

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.

Print Photo Editing

No
27EP950
MEG 342C
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EP950
MEG 342C
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EP950
MEG 342C
5.1
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EP950
MEG 342C
Yes
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EP950
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EP950
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$3,000
$850
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits236 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/A446 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %98.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms1.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/109.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo