A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize vibrant colors and deep blacks for tasks like HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EP950 with OLED technology is a strong choice despite its premium price. However, it is not well-suited for tasks that benefit from a larger screen and wider aspect ratio, such as productivity. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ73A offers a wider screen and is better for multitasking and productivity due to its aspect ratio, and also comes at a more affordable price. It's also suitable for print photo editing but falls short for high-end gaming or color-critical HDR video editing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EP950
34WQ73A
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EP950
34WQ73A
3.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.6
27EP950
34WQ73A
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both only fair for productivity, though the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.9
27EP950
34WQ73A
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$3,000
27EP950
34WQ73A
$400
Product image
Product image

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EP950
34WQ73A
No
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
27EP950
34WQ73A
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EP950
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EP950
34WQ73A
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$3,000
$400
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/AUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms10 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo