A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen size and a better gaming experience with a higher refresh rate, the LG 32GS95UE would be the preferable choice, especially considering it is less expensive. However, if you are focused on high-quality color accuracy for tasks like print photo editing or HDR video editing, the LG 27EP950 stands out, although it comes at a higher cost. The tradeoff for the 27EP950's superior color performance is a lower refresh rate, making it less ideal for competitive gaming compared to the 32GS95UE. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EP950
32GS95UE
6.2
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.9
27EP950
32GS95UE
8.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$3,000
27EP950
32GS95UE
$1,100
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,100.

Print Photo Editing

No
27EP950
32GS95UE
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EP950
32GS95UE
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

6.6
27EP950
32GS95UE
7.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be good for productivity, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EP950
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EP950
32GS95UE
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EP950
32GS95UE
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$3,000
$1,100
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/AUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo