If competitive gaming is your priority and you're looking to save some money, the ViewSonic XG2431 with its higher refresh rate and lower response time will be more responsive, although on a smaller and lower resolution screen. However, for a better all-around experience with higher contrast, better color depth, and superior HDR performance, the KTC M27T20 is a strong choice, especially if HDR gaming and media consumption are important to you, and you prefer a larger, higher resolution display. It does come at a higher price, so consider if the improvements in image quality and size are worth the investment for your needs. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Excellent contrast
Good brightness
Very good color volume
Very good response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
4000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
93.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.1/10
6.9/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming, though the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.1/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is good for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.6/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
4000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$500
$245
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) has a price of $500 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The KTC M27T20 brings mini-LED and HDR1000 features to much more affordable price levels than before. It cuts some corners, however, and the settings require a lot of tuning for optimal colors and black levels."
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.