If you're on a tighter budget and still want strong performance for gaming and media consumption, the KTC M27T20 might be a smart choice for you. Its smaller size and lower price point make it accessible, while still offering good image quality and gaming features. Alternatively, the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 offers an immersive, ultra-wide display that's excellent for productivity with the tradeoff of a significantly higher price. It's not as suitable for HDR gaming and media due to its lower color gamut coverage, but if you prioritize an expansive screen for multitasking and can afford the premium, it’s an impressive option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Excellent contrast
Very good color volume
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
7.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
4000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
93.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good.
Competitive Gaming
6.1/10
5.4/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.6/10
7.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
4000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good.
Cost
$500
$1,024
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) has a price of $500 and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) costs $1,024.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Productivity
7.1/10
6.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) to be good for productivity, while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is only fair.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"The KTC M27T20 brings mini-LED and HDR1000 features to much more affordable price levels than before. It cuts some corners, however, and the settings require a lot of tuning for optimal colors and black levels."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.