The KTC M27P20 Pro offers superior image clarity, higher resolution, and better color accuracy, making it well-suited for professional photo editing and HDR gaming. If those aspects are important to you and you're willing to invest in a higher-priced monitor, it's a strong choice. On the other hand, the ViewSonic XG2431 has a much lower price and higher refresh rate, which is ideal for competitive gaming where fast response time and fluid motion are crucial, but its lower resolution and color performance make it less optimal for productivity tasks and media consumption. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
Excellent for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Excellent for media consumption
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Very good color volume
Very good response time
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.3/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.2/10
6.9/10
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
48 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) and KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming, though the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
10.0/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.1/10
5.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$800
$245
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Gaming and HDR are the two target uses for this screen, and it does generally very well in both. For gaming there are good response times, a single overdrive mode experience for VRR, super low input lag and solid support for latest gen consoles too. The moderately high 160Hz refresh rate provides good motion clarity, and is a nice combination with the high 4K resolution that provides a sharp and crisp image."
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.