If you prioritize high-quality images for HDR gaming and media, and work that involves digital and print photo editing, the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) offers excellent performance in these areas and comes with a more attractive price. However, the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) provides superior contrast and is larger, which might enhance your viewing experience for media consumption and casual gaming, but its peak brightness is lower, affecting its performance in bright environments. For competitive gaming, both offer high refresh rates and low response times, but the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is better suited for productivity tasks due to its higher text and image clarity. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
Best in class for productivity
Excellent for media consumption
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Best in class brightness
Very good color volume
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Key differences
Productivity
10.0/10
7.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good.
Media Consumption
9.1/10
8.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good.
Cost
$800
$1,100
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,100.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.3/10
9.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be best in class for casual gaming, while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent.
Competitive Gaming
6.2/10
6.2/10
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
48 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"Gaming and HDR are the two target uses for this screen, and it does generally very well in both. For gaming there are good response times, a single overdrive mode experience for VRR, super low input lag and solid support for latest gen consoles too. The moderately high 160Hz refresh rate provides good motion clarity, and is a nice combination with the high 4K resolution that provides a sharp and crisp image."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.