A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If high-quality HDR gaming and media consumption, as well as digital photo editing, are important to you, the KTC M27P20 Pro with its MiniLED panel may serve you better, offering peak brightness and superior color accuracy, making it great for vibrant visuals and precise work. However, if you prefer a larger screen and can invest more, the LG 32GQ950 offers a bigger display, which enhances immersion in games and media, although its HDR performance and color accuracy aren't on par with the KTC. For competitive gaming, both offer similar high refresh rates but the KTC has a slightly sharper image due to its smaller screen and therefore higher pixels per inch. For productivity, the LG’s larger screen could be more beneficial for multitasking and design tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
- Excellent for casual gaming
- Best in class for productivity
- Excellent for media consumption
- Very good text clarity
- Very good image clarity
- Good contrast
- Best in class brightness
- Very good color volume
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
- The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.3
6.2
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
6.2
4.7
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
3.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.8 ms
48 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
10.0
8.1
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good.
Media Consumption
9.1
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1040 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$800
$930
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) costs $930.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) | LG 32GQ950 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$800 | $930 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | MiniLED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 576 | 32 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 921:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 367 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 1040 nits | 1007 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 99.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 3 ms | 5.8 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 160 Hz | 20 - 160 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.5/10 | 8.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 163 PPI | 139 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Semi-Gloss | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
TFT Central
Simon Baker | January 2023
"Gaming and HDR are the two target uses for this screen, and it does generally very well in both. For gaming there are good response times, a single overdrive mode experience for VRR, super low input lag and solid support for latest gen consoles too. The moderately high 160Hz refresh rate provides good motion clarity, and is a nice combination with the high 4K resolution that provides a sharp and crisp image."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) vs. Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) vs. Sony M9 (IPS FALD)
VS
Compare KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) vs. MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. LG 38WN95C (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
