A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
KTC G27P6
Company ProductName Specs




34M2C8600
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and a higher refresh rate, the KTC G27P6 could be suitable as it offers good performance in fast-paced games but has limitations in brightness and color when compared to the Philips 34M2C8600. On the other hand, if you are into HDR gaming, media consumption, or any creative work like digital or print photo editing, the Philips, with its wider screen and better color accuracy, contrast, and brightness, would be worth considering despite its lower refresh rate which may not perform as well in competitive gaming environments. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

9.6
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

2.8
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.6
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
9.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
Yes
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
Yes
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
9.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
97.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Cost

$800
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
$800
Product imageProduct image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) has a price of $800 and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
KTC G27P6
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$800
$800
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
700 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %148.8 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
1.4/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
2.5/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,900
Recommendations made
18,885
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo