If cost is a primary concern and you still want a solid gaming experience with OLED quality, the KTC G27P6 offers good value. For those who prioritize an immersive gaming and media experience with a larger, ultrawide screen, the MSI 45GS96QB will be a superior choice. The MSI also has benefits for digital and print photo editing due to its color gamut coverage. However, the KTC G27P6's smaller size might be preferred for those with limited space, plus it can handle casual gaming well. Remember, the MSI may offer more screen real estate, but it comes at a higher price point. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good brightness
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
5.9/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$800
$1,700
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) has a price of $800 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
97.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
2.8/10
2.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.6/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.