A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
KTC G27P6
Company ProductName Specs




39GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If price is a major factor and you're looking for a monitor that provides a rich gaming experience with deep blacks and high contrast, the KTC G27P6 could be a great choice while saving you money. However, for an expansive and immersive gaming and productivity experience with a larger screen, the LG 39GS95QE may justify the higher cost for its wider display and high-quality color reproduction, which is also beneficial for photo editing. Keep in mind that both monitors offer similar refresh rates and OLED advantages, but the LG's larger size could enhance media consumption despite its fair brightness and image clarity compared to the KTC's very good qualities in those areas. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good brightness
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Good for media consumption

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

9.6
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
6.3
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

2.8
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
5.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
PIXELS PER INCH
102 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.6
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
7.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$800
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
$1,500
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) has a price of $800 and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,500.

Print Photo Editing

No
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
Yes
The KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
700 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
97.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
KTC G27P6
39GS95QE
No
Both the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED) and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
KTC KTC G27P6 (W-OLED)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$800
$1,500
Screen Size
27"39"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
700 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
102 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
1.4/106.4/10
Image Clarity Score
2.5/106.7/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo