A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32Q1U
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 271QPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen and higher resolution, the Innocn 32Q1U with its W-OLED technology could be excellent for HDR gaming, media consumption, and accurate photo editing. However, if competitive gaming is important to you and you're looking for the best refresh rate and response times, the MSI MAG 271QPX – which also boasts impressive color performance for HDR gaming and video editing – offers great value at a lower price. Keep in mind, the MSI has a smaller screen and lower resolution, which might impact your productivity or media viewing experience in contrast to the larger Innocn. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
  • The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
10.0
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.8
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are both only fair for productivity, though the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,000
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
$750
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) costs $750.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
10.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

9.5
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$750
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
540 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown138.4 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 360 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo