A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32Q1U
Company ProductName Specs




39GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you're looking for a monitor mainly for media consumption and digital photo editing, and appreciate a higher resolution, the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is less expensive and offers superb contrast and color depth, though it has lower refresh rates making it less ideal for competitive gaming. On the other hand, the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) with its ultrawide screen is great for productivity and competitive gaming due to its higher refresh rate and wider aspect ratio, but it comes at a higher price and the resolution isn't as high as the Innocn's, which may affect how sharp the image appears. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32Q1U
39GS95QE
6.3
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.8
32Q1U
39GS95QE
5.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
102 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.5
32Q1U
39GS95QE
7.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,000
32Q1U
39GS95QE
$1,500
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,500.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32Q1U
39GS95QE
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32Q1U
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32Q1U
39GS95QE
No
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$1,500
Screen Size
32"39"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
540 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
UnknownUnknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI102 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/106.7/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo