If you prioritize a larger screen and higher resolution for tasks like digital photo editing or HDR gaming and media consumption, and are willing to invest more, the Innocn 32Q1U could be a good fit for you. However, if fast-paced gaming is more important to you and you're looking for a more affordable option, the LG 27GS95QE offers features like a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate range, which are crucial for competitive gaming, though it might not be as suitable for productivity due to its smaller screen size and lower resolution. Both monitors are strong in color performance and similar in terms of OLED technology benefits. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
Best in class for media consumption
Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.7/10
9.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.5 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
6.8/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
7.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$1,000
$723
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $723.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.7/10
9.6/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.