A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32Q1U
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen size and high static contrast for an immersive HDR gaming and media consumption experience, the Innocn 32Q1U offers these advantages at a more affordable price, but its overall image clarity and text quality are not as sharp. On the other hand, the LG 27EP950, while more expensive, provides exceptional image clarity, making it better suited for digital photo editing and tasks requiring high attention to detail. For competitive gaming, neither of these monitors is ideal due to their lower refresh rates. Both offer OLED technology which generally means deeper blacks and vibrant colors for enjoyable viewing, but keep in mind that OLEDs might be more prone to burn-in over time. Choose based on whether you prioritize screen size and price (Innocn) or better image clarity for detail-oriented work (LG). Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32Q1U
27EP950
5.4
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

9.5
32Q1U
27EP950
7.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,000
32Q1U
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
27EP950
No
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
27EP950
No
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32Q1U
27EP950
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

6.8
32Q1U
27EP950
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32Q1U
27EP950
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32Q1U
27EP950
No
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$3,000
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
540 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
21
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo