If picture quality, particularly for HDR gaming and media consumption, is a priority and you're willing to invest more, the Innocn 27M2V with its higher HDR peak brightness and broader color gamut is suitable. It also excels in productivity with its 4K resolution, making it ideal for tasks that benefit from sharp image detail. However, for a balance between cost and performance, particularly if competitive gaming is important, the MSI MAG274QRF-QD offers good response time and a refresh rate that's just as high, at a lower price. This monitor is also well-suited for print photo editing, despite not being recommended for HDR video editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Very good contrast
Very good brightness
Very good color volume
Advantages of the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
The MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
8.2/10
6.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1098:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
790 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
1175 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
80.2 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
9.9/10
6.2/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
164 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
8.3/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1098:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
790 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
1175 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$730
$436
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $730 and the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) costs $436.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.9/10
5.8/10
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
8.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
9.1 ms
20 - 160 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
790 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Thanks to the wide color gamut, games and videos will look even more vibrant than the standard wide gamut displays (such as LG’s Nano IPS with 98% DCI-P3 and ~90% Adobe RGB, for instance), especially when it comes to blue, cyan and green shades. All in all, if you want a 27″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with a mini LED FALD backlight, the Innocn 27M2V is currently the best model available."
"The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has the largest color gamut we’ve ever seen and near-perfect out-of-box accuracy. sRGB content will be oversaturated though, and HDR doesn’t do anything for image quality."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.