If budget is a concern, the Gigabyte M34WQ offers a good balance for casual gaming, productivity, and general media consumption without a hefty price tag. Despite its lower cost, it comes with some features like a higher brightness and USB ports with power delivery, which might be useful for connecting and charging devices directly through the monitor. On the other hand, the LG 34GN850B, although more expensive, has a slightly faster response time, which can be a boon for competitive gaming, and higher HDR peak brightness, enhancing the experience for media consumption, especially if you watch a lot of HDR content. Neither are particularly strong for serious photo or video editing due to color volume limitations. Choose the Gigabyte if you want a well-rounded monitor for less money, or the LG if you're willing to pay extra for better competitive gaming performance and richer media viewing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 34GN850B (IPS)
Very good response time
Key differences
Cost
$330
$750
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the LG 34GN850B (IPS) costs $750.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
950:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
4.5/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
The LG 34GN850B (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
6.3/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
950:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) to be only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the LG 34GN850B (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
"Mid-range 3440 x 1440 144Hz VA monitors are ~$500 to $600 these days. You are getting a much better product for the higher price of the LG, with faster response times and better colors (outside of the contrast ratio), but this is definitely a monitor that is reserved for those that want the best of the best and are willing to pay for it."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.