If you prioritize a wider screen for an immersive experience in productivity tasks or casual gaming, the Gigabyte M34WQ with its ultrawide aspect might suit you better. However, if your focus is more on competitive gaming, the LG 27GP83B with its slightly higher refresh capabilities will serve you well, with minimal ghosting for fast-paced action, despite its smaller screen size. Neither is ideally suited for serious HDR gaming or video editing, but for digital photo editing, both cover a good amount of the sRGB spectrum, with the LG slightly edging out in color accuracy. If you're involved in print photo editing, though, these may not meet professional color fidelity demands. Both monitors offer adjustable stands and a matte finish that reduces glare, enhancing the comfort of extended use. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 27GP83B (IPS).
Advantages of the LG 27GP83B (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
6.0/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.8 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
365 nits
The LG 27GP83B (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$330
$389
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the LG 27GP83B (IPS) costs $389.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
6.0/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
807:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
365 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
472 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 27GP83B (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.3/10
6.2/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 27GP83B (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
807:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
365 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
472 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) to be only fair for media consumption, while the LG 27GP83B (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 27GP83B (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 27GP83B (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 27GP83B (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and LG 27GP83B (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the LG 27GP83B (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
"The LG 27GP83B-B offers today’s sweet spot in gaming specs and capabilities in a well-designed premium package. It’s the first 1440p upgrade over the previous releases such as the LG 27GL83A-B with improvements in image quality thanks to its Nano IPS panel."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.