If you prioritize a wider screen and performing a variety of tasks like casual gaming and productivity, the Gigabyte M34WQ with its ultrawide aspect ratio offers good value for a midrange price, although it's not the best for high-level color work or intense HDR gaming. On the other hand, if top-tier contrast, peak brightness in HDR, and color accuracy for print photo editing are more important, and you don't mind the smaller size, the KTC M27T20 excels in these areas and could justify the higher price, especially if competitive gaming or HDR media is a priority for you. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED).
Advantages of the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Excellent contrast
Good brightness
Very good color volume
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
9.5/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
93.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
6.1/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.3/10
7.1/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
8.6/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$330
$500
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) costs $500.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
"The KTC M27T20 brings mini-LED and HDR1000 features to much more affordable price levels than before. It cuts some corners, however, and the settings require a lot of tuning for optimal colors and black levels."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.