A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
M34WQ
Company ProductName Specs




M27P20 Pro
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

The Gigabyte M34WQ offers a wider, ultrawide display and a budget-friendly choice for casual gaming, with a fair refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, but its color performance and HDR capabilities are modest, making it less ideal for serious media consumption and professional color work. On the other hand, the KTC M27P20 Pro excels in HDR gaming and media with higher color accuracy, peak brightness, and comprehensive color gamut support, and its higher resolution and mini-LED technology offer exceptional image clarity and text quality, which can greatly benefit productivity and professional photo and video editing, albeit at a higher cost. If your focus is on competitive gaming or intensive creative work, the KTC's faster response time and superb contrast may justify its price. For a more budget-conscious or casual use case that values a larger screen size for multitasking, the Gigabyte may be the better option. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
  • The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED).
Advantages of the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
  • Excellent for casual gaming
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Very good text clarity
  • Very good image clarity
  • Good contrast
  • Best in class brightness
  • Very good color volume
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
9.3
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1040 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

4.5
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
6.2
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 160 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.3
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
10.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.0
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
9.1
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1040 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$330
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
M34WQ
M27P20 Pro
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)

GENERAL

Price
$330
$800
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMiniLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A576

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1074:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
379 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
372 nits1040 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
102.9 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8.5 ms3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 144 Hz48 - 160 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/107/10
Ghosting Score
7.5/108.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/108/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | November 2023
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."

KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

TFT Central

Simon Baker | January 2023
"Gaming and HDR are the two target uses for this screen, and it does generally very well in both. For gaming there are good response times, a single overdrive mode experience for VRR, super low input lag and solid support for latest gen consoles too. The moderately high 160Hz refresh rate provides good motion clarity, and is a nice combination with the high 4K resolution that provides a sharp and crisp image."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo