If you're looking for a wide, immersive display for multitasking and casual gaming, the Gigabyte M34WQ with its larger, ultrawide screen could be a great fit. However, if competitive gaming is a priority and you want a monitor that offers more crispness and smoothness in fast-paced games, the KTC H27T22, with its higher refresh capabilities and lower price, is a compelling choice. Both monitors perform similarly in productivity and media consumption, but for a more cost-effective option, the KTC H27T22 is a solid pick, especially if a 27-inch screen suffices for your needs. On the other hand, the Gigabyte M34WQ provides a broader view but at a higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the KTC H27T22 (IPS).
Advantages of the KTC H27T22 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
5.8/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The KTC H27T22 (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the KTC H27T22 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$330
$210
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the KTC H27T22 (IPS) costs $210.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Productivity
6.3/10
6.2/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) to be only fair for media consumption, while the KTC H27T22 (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and KTC H27T22 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the KTC H27T22 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
"The KTC H27T22 is an excellent gaming monitor for the money thanks to its fully adjsutable stand, plethora of features and 1440p IPS panel with a wide color gamut, high peak brightness, quick response time and smooth VRR performance."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.