If you prioritize a large screen and higher resolution for work or a more immersive gaming and media experience, the Gigabyte M32UC with its 32-inch display and 4K resolution would be a great fit, despite its higher price. It's also equipped with features for HDR gaming and has a higher contrast ratio, which generally means better picture quality. On the other hand, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option and engage in more competitive gaming where response time and refresh rate are critical, the MSI G273QPF with its faster response time and slightly higher refresh rate would be more appropriate. Keep in mind, though, it has a smaller 27-inch screen and lower resolution, which might be less ideal for productivity tasks and immersive gaming or media consumption. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good brightness
Advantages of the MSI G273QPF (IPS)
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.3/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
2776:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
506 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
85.4 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is good for casual gaming, while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.7/10
5.8/10
160Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
8.7 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.9 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
The MSI G273QPF (IPS) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
9.6/10
6.2/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is best in class for productivity, while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
7.3/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
2776:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
500 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
506 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is good for media consumption, while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$550
$244
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) has a price of $550 and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) costs $244.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Gigabyte M32UC is a terrific value. For around $600, you get a full-featured 4K gaming monitor with top-shelf video processing, a colorful bright image and a form factor suited for both work and play."
"Thanks to its 27″ 1440p IPS panel with wide color gamut, the MSI G273QF delivers an immersive viewing experience, while the rapid 1ms GtG response time speed, FreeSync, MBR and 165Hz ensure buttery-smooth performance – all that at an appealing price!"
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.