If you prioritize higher resolution for productivity or casual gaming on a tighter budget, the Gigabyte M32U with its larger screen and solid text clarity is a good pick; however, its performance in color-critical tasks like print photo editing isn't ideal. On the other hand, if you're willing to invest more for an immersive media consumption and HDR gaming experience, consider the ViewSonic XG341C-2K with its superior contrast and brightness, despite its lower resolution and lesser suitability for competitive gaming due to a lower refresh rate. The ViewSonic's curve may also enhance your gaming and movie-watching experience but note that it can be less optimal for tasks that require straight lines, like graphic design. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED)
Excellent for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Good contrast
Very good brightness
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.2/10
9.3/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
1125:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
456 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
87.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
97.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is excellent for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
5.4/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
7.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,200 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
8.0/10
6.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.7/10
7.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1125:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
456 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$650
$1,499
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) has a price of $650 and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) costs $1,499.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.