A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
M32Q
Company ProductName Specs




27M2V
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you enjoy casual or competitive gaming on a larger screen, the Gigabyte M32Q offers a good experience with a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support for smooth gameplay. However, if you're looking for superior visual quality for media consumption and HDR gaming, and also do digital or print photo editing, the Innocn 27M2V's higher screen resolution, better color accuracy, and higher brightness with HDR support make it a better choice despite the higher cost. Keep in mind, the Innocn also has a smaller screen, which could impact your immersion or multi-tasking space. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
  • Very good for casual gaming
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good text clarity
  • Very good image clarity
  • Very good contrast
  • Very good brightness
  • Very good color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
M32Q
27M2V
8.2
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
460 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
87.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
80.2 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

4.7
M32Q
27M2V
5.9
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
6.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
20 - 170 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

5.0
M32Q
27M2V
9.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
164 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.5
M32Q
27M2V
8.3
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
460 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$455
M32Q
27M2V
$730
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) has a price of $455 and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $730.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
M32Q
27M2V
Yes
The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
M32Q
27M2V
Yes
The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
M32Q
27M2V
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
M32Q
27M2V
No
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)

GENERAL

Price
$455
$730
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMiniLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A1152

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1195:11098:1
SDR Peak Brightness
333 nits790 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
460 nits1175 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100.6 %99.3 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.1 ms8.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 170 Hz20 - 160 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/107/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/107.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
93 PPI164 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.3/108.1/10
Image Clarity Score
6.3/108.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Shopping

Chevron down

Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | July 2023
"Thanks to its IPS panel with a wide color gamut and fast pixel response time speed, the Gigabyte M32Q offers both an immersive and responsive gaming experience. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, plenty of connectivity options, and a lot of useful features – all at a reasonable price."

Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | January 2024
"Thanks to the wide color gamut, games and videos will look even more vibrant than the standard wide gamut displays (such as LG’s Nano IPS with 98% DCI-P3 and ~90% Adobe RGB, for instance), especially when it comes to blue, cyan and green shades. All in all, if you want a 27″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with a mini LED FALD backlight, the Innocn 27M2V is currently the best model available."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo