If you're focused on competitive gaming and willing to spend more, the Gigabyte M32Q offers a higher refresh rate and lower response time, which means smoother gameplay and reduced ghosting. However, for a more immersive experience in casual gaming, media consumption, and productivity, the slightly less expensive Gigabyte M34WQ with its wider screen and aspect ratio would be a better fit, while still maintaining decent performance for those uses. Neither monitor is the best for HDR gaming or media, but both are suitable for general use and digital photo editing. If budget is a major concern, M34WQ offers a broader set of features at a lower cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Productivity
5.0/10
6.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.5/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
460 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$455
$330
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) has a price of $455 and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) costs $330.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1195:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
460 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
87.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
4.7/10
4.5/10
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.5 ms
20 - 170 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Thanks to its IPS panel with a wide color gamut and fast pixel response time speed, the Gigabyte M32Q offers both an immersive and responsive gaming experience. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, plenty of connectivity options, and a lot of useful features – all at a reasonable price."
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.