If competitive gaming is a priority for you and you're okay with spending more, the Gigabyte M27Q-X with its higher refresh rate capabilities, and some additional features like USB power delivery could be a better fit, yet it doesn't excel in HDR gaming and media consumption. Meanwhile, the more affordable MSI G273QPF may offer slightly less performance in terms of gaming due to a lower refresh rate but still has a good response time and is well-suited for digital photo editing. However, it lacks the added features and versatility of the Gigabyte and isn't suitable for tasks requiring accurate color representation in wider gamuts like HDR video editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Good brightness
Advantages of the MSI G273QPF (IPS)
The MSI G273QPF (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.0/10
5.8/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
6.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.9 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$365
$244
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) has a price of $365 and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) costs $244.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.5/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
73.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
Productivity
6.5/10
6.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
Media Consumption
6.1/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The company delivers again with the Gigabyte M27Q X, a 1440p monitor that comes equipped with just about everything you want and need from a gaming monitor. It may not be a 4K panel, but it more than makes up for its lower resolution in performance, bringing a whopping 240Hz refresh rate and a host of unusual features, including an onboard KVM and plenty of ports. It's a great performer, though low brightness levels and a so-so contrast ratio keep it short of top marks."
"Thanks to its 27″ 1440p IPS panel with wide color gamut, the MSI G273QF delivers an immersive viewing experience, while the rapid 1ms GtG response time speed, FreeSync, MBR and 165Hz ensure buttery-smooth performance – all that at an appealing price!"
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.