A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
M27Q-X
Company ProductName Specs




M34WQ
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If competitive gaming is your priority, the Gigabyte M27Q-X offers a higher refresh rate for smoother gameplay along with features like strobing, making it better suited for fast-paced games. On the other hand, if you're focused on productivity and prefer a wider screen for multitasking, the Gigabyte M34WQ with its larger, ultra-wide display may serve you better despite its lower refresh rate. Neither monitor is ideal for HDR gaming or video editing due to limitations in HDR peak brightness and color volume. For digital photo editing, both monitors cover a wide color gamut, but the M27Q-X has a slight edge in AdobeRGB. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
  • The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.5
M27Q-X
M34WQ
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
73.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

8.0
M27Q-X
M34WQ
4.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.5 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$365
M27Q-X
M34WQ
$330
Product image
Product image

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) has a price of $365 and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) costs $330.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
M27Q-X
M34WQ
No
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.5
M27Q-X
M34WQ
6.3
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.

Media Consumption

6.1
M27Q-X
M34WQ
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
M27Q-X
M34WQ
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
M27Q-X
M34WQ
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
M27Q-X
M34WQ
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$365
$330
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz144Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1088:11074:1
SDR Peak Brightness
459 nits379 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
508 nits372 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100.1 %102.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.8 ms8.5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesYes
Persistence Blur Score
8/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
8/107.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

PC Mag

Zachery Cuevas | August 2022
"The company delivers again with the Gigabyte M27Q X, a 1440p monitor that comes equipped with just about everything you want and need from a gaming monitor. It may not be a 4K panel, but it more than makes up for its lower resolution in performance, bringing a whopping 240Hz refresh rate and a host of unusual features, including an onboard KVM and plenty of ports. It's a great performer, though low brightness levels and a so-so contrast ratio keep it short of top marks."

Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | November 2023
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo