A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
FO32U2
Company ProductName Specs




27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you value a larger screen size for immersive gaming and media, the Gigabyte FO32U2 with its 32-inch display is a solid choice, especially considering it's less expensive than the LG. It's also better for HDR gaming thanks to its higher brightness. However, if you need a monitor with higher text clarity and better image quality for productivity, the LG 27EQ850 might be worth the extra cost. Keep in mind, though, the LG has lower performance for gaming due to its slower response time and lack of variable refresh rate support. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.8
FO32U2
27EQ850
5.4
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

7.6
FO32U2
27EQ850
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is only fair.

Media Consumption

10.0
FO32U2
27EQ850
7.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,100
FO32U2
27EQ850
$1,997
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,100 and the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) costs $1,997.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
FO32U2
27EQ850
No
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

Yes
FO32U2
27EQ850
No
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.9
FO32U2
27EQ850
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
FO32U2
27EQ850
Yes
Both the Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
FO32U2
27EQ850
Yes
Both the Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED) and the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED)LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED)LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$1,997
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
01
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo