A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
FI32Q-X
Company ProductName Specs




34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're prioritizing a tight budget with a decent competitive gaming experience, the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) would serve you well due to its high refresh rate, VRR (variable refresh rate) support, and good response time, making it suitable for fast-paced games. However, for the ultimate in image quality and an immersive experience for HDR gaming and media consumption due to infinite contrast and wider color gamut, the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) stands out, albeit at a higher cost. This choice would also benefit productivity with its wider screen. Consider how much you value price over performance in different areas when making your decision. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.3
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
6.3
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.8
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
5.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.4
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
7.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$500
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
$1,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) has a price of $500 and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,300.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
Yes
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
Yes
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
FI32Q-X
34GS95QE
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$500
$1,300
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
157 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,500
Recommendations made
16,275
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo