If you're looking for better performance in competitive gaming due to a higher refresh rate and you don't mind spending more, the Gigabyte FI32Q-X would suit you well. However, it might disappoint in HDR gaming and media consumption due to its limited peak brightness and color volume. The Lenovo G24-20, while budget-friendly and offering good text clarity, is more aligned with casual gaming and productivity but lags in competitive gaming capabilities and doesn't support HDR content. It also has a smaller screen size, which might not be as immersive for media consumption compared to the larger Gigabyte monitor. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Good brightness
Advantages of the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS).
Key differences
Cost
$500
$195
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) has a price of $500 and the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) costs $195.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.3/10
5.7/10
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
4.8/10
4.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.