The Dell U3223QE is better for tasks that benefit from more accurate colors, such as digital photo editing, due to its wider color gamut coverage and higher static contrast, providing deeper blacks. However, the Gigabyte M32U is more suitable for gaming, especially competitive gaming, because it has a higher refresh rate and supports variable refresh rate, reducing screen tearing, and it also includes motion blur reduction features. Both monitors are good for productivity and have 4K resolution, but if you frequently edit HDR video or need true HDR experience, neither monitor is ideal as they do not excel in HDR peak brightness or color volume for HDR content. If you prioritize gaming performance and responsive gameplay, the Gigabyte M32U is the better choice, while for color-critical work, the Dell might be more suitable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black)
Good for media consumption
Good brightness
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
4.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
24.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$825
$650
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) has a price of $825 and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) costs $650.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.2/10
6.2/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
2104:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
438 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
94.9 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.0 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
Productivity
7.9/10
8.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M32U (IPS) to be very good for productivity, while the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is good.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
2104:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
438 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) to be good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is only fair.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.