If budget is a concern, the Dell S3422DWG provides a larger, high-resolution screen, suitable for day-to-day tasks, casual gaming, and viewing wide-screen content. However, if you're a competitive gamer or want a more immersive experience with higher contrast and responsiveness, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9, while pricier, offers a significantly larger screen and superior gaming features. It's also more suitable for those interested in high dynamic range content due to its greater brightness and color range. Keep in mind, the size and price of the Samsung might not be justifiable for every-day productivity or casual entertainment needs. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S3422DWG (VA)
The Dell S3422DWG (VA) has no clear advantages over the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED).
Advantages of the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED)
Good for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good contrast
Good brightness
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.7/10
7.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
2725:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
344 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
528 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
86.8 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the Dell S3422DWG (VA) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.5/10
5.4/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
9.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
344 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and Dell S3422DWG (VA) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
6.2/10
6.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) and Dell S3422DWG (VA) are both only fair for productivity, though the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.
Cost
$330
$1,024
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Dell S3422DWG (VA) has a price of $330 and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) costs $1,024.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell S3422DWG (VA) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Media Consumption
6.7/10
7.1/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
2725:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
344 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
420 nits
528 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
2000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) to be good for media consumption, while the Dell S3422DWG (VA) is only fair.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S3422DWG (VA) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S3422DWG (VA) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S3422DWG (VA) and Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S3422DWG (VA) and the Samsung S49AG95 Odyssey Neo G9 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"The Dell S3422DWG is, overall, a great monitor that delivers on most of its promises, providing a sharp ultrawide experience with smooth motion. It is, however, not as great of a value proposition, costing a bit too much compared to similar competitors."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.