If cost is a major concern and you engage primarily in casual gaming or need a monitor for everyday productivity tasks, the Dell S3222DGM offers a balance of good gaming performance and value, though its lower resolution and lower color gamut may not be ideal for high-definition media consumption or precision tasks like digital photo editing. On the other hand, while the Gigabyte M32UC is more expensive, it offers a higher resolution for sharper images, which is great for media consumption and productivity, especially if working with fine details. It also has better color performance that's beneficial for tasks involving color work but isn't fully equipped for professional HDR video editing. Both monitors have a VA panel, so they offer good contrast, but keep in mind that neither is optimal for the most competitive gaming due to response times and potential ghosting. Choose the Gigabyte M32UC if a sharper image and better color reproduction outweigh the higher cost for you, or opt for the Dell S3222DGM if you prefer to save money without major compromises for general use and casual gaming. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S3222DGM (VA)
Very good contrast
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good brightness
Key differences
Productivity
5.1/10
9.6/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
7.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
4365:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2776:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
506 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is good for media consumption, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is poor.
Cost
$250
$550
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) has a price of $250 and the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) costs $550.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.9/10
7.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
4365:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2776:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
506 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.4 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M32UC (VA) to be good for casual gaming, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.6/10
4.7/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
10.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.7 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) compare to other monitors
"Aside from its omission of HDR, the Dell S3222DGM has no flaws of consequence. For a surprisingly low price, it delivers premium quality gaming performance with 165 Hz and Adaptive-Sync through a high-contrast curved VA panel with a wide and accurate color gamut."
"The Gigabyte M32UC is a terrific value. For around $600, you get a full-featured 4K gaming monitor with top-shelf video processing, a colorful bright image and a form factor suited for both work and play."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.