If cost is a significant consideration and you primarily engage in casual gaming and productivity tasks, the Dell S2722QC could be a suitable choice, as it offers good text clarity and image sharpness for general use. However, for a larger screen size and a better overall gaming experience due to higher refresh rates and variable refresh rate (VRR) support, the Gigabyte M32U might be worth the extra investment, especially if competitive gaming and expansive digital workspace are priorities. Neither monitor is ideal for HDR gaming and media consumption, but both are capable of handling digital photo editing well. Keep in mind that with the Gigabyte M32U, you also get additional features like a higher refresh rate, which could benefit fast-paced gaming, although its higher price must be factored into your decision. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S2722QC (IPS)
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good response time
Key differences
Cost
$400
$650
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) has a price of $400 and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) costs $650.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
6.2/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1304:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
402 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
82.9 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M32U (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Dell S2722QC (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
4.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
14.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
40 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
7.9/10
8.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
164 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M32U (IPS) to be very good for productivity, while the Dell S2722QC (IPS) is good.
Media Consumption
6.8/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1304:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
402 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Dell S2722QC offers 4K, USB-C, HDR, and integrated speakers for a uniquely affordable price, but makes some image quality sacrifices to hit its low cost. It’s a good everyday productivity monitor that you should buy for its features, not its performance."
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.