If you're on a tight budget and primarily involved in everyday computing tasks, the Dell S2721DS with its standard resolution and size may serve you well, despite its limited gaming and media capabilities. On the other hand, if you're a serious gamer or content creator willing to invest in top-tier visual performance, with striking contrast and color accuracy, the MSI MEG 342C offers an immersive experience due to its high-end OLED technology, but this comes at a higher price. The latter is especially suited for HDR gaming and media, as well as tasks requiring precise colors, like photo editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S2721DS (IPS)
Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Excellent for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
75Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1015:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
334 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Dell S2721DS (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
9.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1015:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
334 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Dell S2721DS (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$309
$850
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Dell S2721DS (IPS) has a price of $309 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Dell S2721DS (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell S2721DS (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
5.1/10
75Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
17.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
48 - 75 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
334 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) and Dell S2721DS (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
5.9/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Dell S2721DS (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S2721DS (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S2721DS (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S2721DS (IPS) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.