If you prioritize a higher resolution and better overall image quality for tasks like HDR video editing and print photo editing, the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) could be a better fit due to its superior color gamut and HDR performance. However, if you're looking for a cost-effective option that still offers good gaming and productivity capabilities, the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) provides a satisfactory experience at a lower price point. Keep in mind that while the KTC excels in media consumption and has a higher pixel density, the Dell could still be a strong choice for more budget-conscious casual gaming and general productivity. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S2721DGF (IPS)
The Dell S2721DGF (IPS) has no clear advantages over the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED).
Advantages of the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
Excellent for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Excellent for media consumption
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
9.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
882:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
368 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
485 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1040 nits
97.2 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for casual gaming, while the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.2/10
10.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
9.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
882:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
368 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
485 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1040 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$300
$800
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Dell S2721DGF (IPS) has a price of $300 and the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) costs $800.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
Yes
The Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
6.2/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
6.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.0 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
368 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) is poor.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) and KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S2721DGF (IPS) and the KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"The Dell S2721DGF checks all the boxes for an upper-mid priced display that can take on the best gaming monitors, and you might even be able to find it for under $500 (it's $450-$500 as of writing). The monitor's 1440p, runs at 165 Hz without overclock, has AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and G-Sync Compatibility, covers a large portion of the DCI-P3 color gamut and includes a lighting effect on the back."
"Gaming and HDR are the two target uses for this screen, and it does generally very well in both. For gaming there are good response times, a single overdrive mode experience for VRR, super low input lag and solid support for latest gen consoles too. The moderately high 160Hz refresh rate provides good motion clarity, and is a nice combination with the high 4K resolution that provides a sharp and crisp image."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.