If you're on a budget and mainly engage in casual or even competitive gaming, the Dell S2522HG with its high refresh rate and good response times could be an excellent choice. However, it has a lower screen resolution which might not be as sharp for productivity tasks or media consumption. On the other hand, the Gigabyte M32U offers a much higher resolution which is great for productivity and a better experience when watching high-resolution content. It also has a larger screen size and is better suited for digital photo editing with a wider color gamut. If you're willing to invest more for these enhanced features, the Gigabyte M32U could better meet your needs for a more versatile monitor. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S2522HG (IPS)
Good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
7.0/10
4.5/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Dell S2522HG (IPS) is good for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.6/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
89 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Dell S2522HG (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.3/10
6.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Dell S2522HG (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$293
$650
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The Dell S2522HG (IPS) has a price of $293 and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) costs $650.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell S2522HG (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
6.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M32U (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Dell S2522HG (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S2522HG (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S2522HG (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S2522HG (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S2522HG (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Dell S2522HG changes the game. This 24.5-inch 1080p gaming monitor has a 240Hz refresh rate, yet it’s commonly sold for $249.99. That’s just tens of dollars more than an average 1080p 144Hz gaming monitor. The S2522HG cuts a few corners in its pursuit of pricing, but it’s a great choice for competitive gamers on a budget."
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.