If you prioritize competitive gaming, the Dell AW2524H offers a higher refresh rate and quicker response, which can give you an edge, but it has a smaller screen and lower resolution, which may not be as good for multitasking or immersive gameplay. Conversely, the Gigabyte M34WQ provides a larger screen size, wider aspect ratio, and higher resolution, enhancing productivity and creating a more immersive experience for casual gaming and media, but its lower refresh rate and response time may not satisfy competitive gamers. The Gigabyte is also more cost-effective, making it a better option if you're looking for a balance between performance and price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.5/10
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
5.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.5 ms
20 - 500 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.9/10
6.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
6.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$500
$330
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) has a price of $500 and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) costs $330.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
5.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
87.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell AW2524H (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.