If you're a competitive gamer looking for smooth gameplay, the Dell AW2524H with its high refresh rate and fast response time excels, but it might disappoint for productivity due to its lower resolution. On the other hand, the Dell S2722QC offers a sharper image with its higher resolution and larger screen, making it better suited for productivity and media consumption, but it's not ideal for competitive gaming due to its lower refresh rate. If HDR gaming and media are important to you, neither monitor is particularly well-suited, but for digital photo editing, both are viable. The S2722QC also brings the versatility of multiple USB ports with power delivery, while the AW2524H offers strobing features. Choose the AW2524H if gaming performance is your priority, but if you're looking for a balance between work and entertainment at a better price, the S2722QC might be your preferred option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Dell S2722QC (IPS)
Good for productivity
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.9/10
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
5.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
14.4 ms
20 - 500 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
40 - 60 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
382 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Dell S2722QC (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.9/10
7.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
164 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
6.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1304:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
382 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
402 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$500
$400
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) has a price of $500 and the Dell S2722QC (IPS) costs $400.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
5.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1304:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
382 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
402 nits
87.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
82.9 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell AW2524H (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Dell S2722QC (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Dell S2722QC (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Dell S2722QC (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Dell S2722QC (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Dell S2722QC (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and the Dell S2722QC (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
"The Dell S2722QC offers 4K, USB-C, HDR, and integrated speakers for a uniquely affordable price, but makes some image quality sacrifices to hit its low cost. It’s a good everyday productivity monitor that you should buy for its features, not its performance."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.