If competitive gaming is a priority, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF with its faster response time and higher refresh rate will enhance your gameplay, but the smaller screen may limit immersion compared to the Samsung S43CG70's larger display. For productivity or media consumption, Samsung's higher resolution provides crisper images, although the Dell's OLED technology offers superior contrast and color depth, making it better for HDR gaming and media. If budget is a concern, the Dell's lower price offers strong gaming and media performance, but Samsung's larger screen could be more satisfying for productivity tasks and immersive entertainment, despite its higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Excellent for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Advantages of the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
7.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
240 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
459 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is good.
Media Consumption
9.4/10
6.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
240 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
459 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is only fair.
Cost
$900
$999
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) has a price of $900 and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) costs $999.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
4.9/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
240 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
5.7/10
5.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
103 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"It may seem like a minor tweak, but the addition of a glossy anti-glare coating makes all the difference. It really lets the OLED panel rip. That this revised "F" model is also cheaper than the OG Alienware OLED and the similarly glossy Philips competition seals the deal. This is our new favourite among the OLED monitor massive."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.