If you prioritize a better gaming experience and consuming HDR media, the Dell Alienware AW3423DW with its OLED technology offers excellent contrast and response times, making it a strong choice. However, if you're looking for a monitor more suitable for print photo editing, with higher brightness levels and still great for productivity tasks, the ViewSonic XG341C-2K may be worth the extra cost due to its Mini LED technology and comprehensive color accuracy. Remember though, the Dell offers higher refresh rates and potentially smoother gameplay, especially for faster-paced games, while the ViewSonic excels in static contrast and may perform better in brightly-lit environments. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED)
Good text clarity
Very good brightness
Key differences
Productivity
5.7/10
6.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is only fair for productivity, while the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
7.4/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
474 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is good.
Cost
$870
$1,499
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) has a price of $870 and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) costs $1,499.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.3/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
474 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
99.4 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
97.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) to be best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is excellent.
Competitive Gaming
5.1/10
5.4/10
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,200 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) and ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"Alienware has brought the best display technology to the desktop with its AW3423DW. With infinite contrast and a huge color gamut, it boasts a stunning image with accurate color and no need for calibration. Gaming performance is superb with smooth motion processing and quick response. This monitor truly raises the bar."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.