If you prioritize a wide field of view and excellent image quality for both gaming and media, the Dell Alienware AW3423DW with its 34-inch display and good refresh rate offers an impressive balance for immersive experiences, though its productivity performance is not as strong. The Gigabyte CO49DQ, with its massive 49-inch screen, provides an even more expansive view, making it fantastic for media consumption and multitasking, but keep in mind that its refresh rate is lower, which might be less ideal for competitive gaming. Both options have OLED panels with deep blacks and vibrant colors, but the Dell has a more adjustable stand, making it easier to position comfortably. Either choice demands a higher price, reflecting their premium features, so your decision should be based on whether you value screen size or the combination of gaming performance and ergonomic flexibility. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED)
Good refresh rate
Good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED)
Best in class brightness
Key differences
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
474 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.4 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.1/10
5.5/10
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
5.7/10
5.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
9.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
243 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
474 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.
Cost
$870
$900
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) has a price of $870 and the Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) costs $900.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW3423DW (QD-OLED) and the Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
"Alienware has brought the best display technology to the desktop with its AW3423DW. With infinite contrast and a huge color gamut, it boasts a stunning image with accurate color and no need for calibration. Gaming performance is superb with smooth motion processing and quick response. This monitor truly raises the bar."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.