If you prioritize a top-notch gaming experience with vibrant colors and deep blacks, the Dell Alienware with QD-OLED technology is an excellent choice, although you will pay a premium price for its high contrast and fast response time, which is crucial for competitive gaming. Conversely, the Gigabyte monitor, while less costly, provides a larger screen and is quite capable for gaming, but it won't match the Alienware's performance in terms of contrast and color. For productivity and general media consumption, the Gigabyte's larger screen may be more beneficial, but it doesn't support HDR content as well as the Alienware. If you're involved in color-sensitive work, both monitors are suitable, but the Alienware slightly outperforms the Gigabyte in color accuracy. Keep in mind that the Alienware's glossy screen may reflect more light, potentially affecting viewing experience, while the Gigabyte's matte finish could be easier on the eyes under bright lighting. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class refresh rate
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.7/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
270Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
235 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
445 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
99.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.7/10
5.3/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
270Hz
0.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 270 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
235 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
4.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
235 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
445 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$900
$500
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) has a price of $900 and the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) costs $500.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED) and the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.